AI Production Audit + Quick Wins

5 days. We diagnose your AI feature, then ship the 1-3 fastest fixes we find.
Your feature is measurably better at the end of the week — not just diagnosed.

€1,500 — half upfront, half on delivery.

What we audit
  • Does your AI search actually find the right answers — or just the closest-looking ones?
  • Is anyone measuring quality, or is "it feels okay" the only metric?
  • How often does the AI make things up, and how do we stop it?
  • How fast is it, how much is it costing you, and what happens if usage spikes?
  • What breaks when OpenAI is down, a user spams the system, or someone tries to game it?
What you get
  • A written diagnostic report (10-15 pages)
  • A pull request with 1-3 quick-win fixes already implemented
  • A clear plan for what's left, with effort and impact estimates
  • A 60-minute walkthrough call to go through everything
GUARANTEE

Our quick-win guarantee.

Half upfront (€750), half on delivery. If we don't ship at least one working improvement to your AI feature in 5 days, you don't pay the second half. You keep the diagnostic report and any code we wrote.

A "quick win" is defined as a code change, delivered as a pull request, that demonstrably improves at least one of: response quality, response latency, error rate, cost per request, or operational visibility. We agree on the definition with you in writing before we start.

Process
Day 1

Kickoff call, access setup, agreed scope — and quick-win targets defined in writing

Day 2–4

We dig in: testing your feature, running real queries, implementing quick-win fixes

Day 5

You get the report + the pull request with implemented fixes

Week 2

60-min walkthrough call: go through the report, Q&A, what to do next

What this audit is NOT
  • Not a full implementation (separate AI Feature Sprint package)
  • Not a stack migration
  • Not a workshop format for teams (see AI Strategy Sprint)
FAQ

What if you find nothing to fix?

Extremely rare. In 90%+ of cases the eval setup is missing entirely; in the rest there are at least retrieval-quality wins. If we genuinely find nothing actionable, you don't pay the second half — you keep the report and any code.

Do we need to give you access to our systems?

Just enough to use your AI feature — usually a regular test account is fine. We sign an NDA before we start.

Can the audit lead to a sprint?

Yes, ~50% of audit clients book a follow-up sprint. The audit price is independent and not a sales call in disguise — you walk away with a usable document and implemented fixes either way.

Technical detail — for engineers
  • Retrieval quality measurement: Recall@K, qualitative inspection of test queries
  • Eval setup review: presence of golden datasets, RAGAS / Promptfoo / custom; CI integration if any
  • Hallucination & grounding analysis: faithfulness vs. answer relevance, citation correctness
  • Latency profiling: end-to-end and per-stage; streaming behaviour; caching coverage
  • Cost analysis: per-query token cost, modeling at projected scale
  • Failure modes: rate-limit handling, fallback strategy, model-outage behaviour, prompt-injection surface, PII leakage
  • Stack we work with: OpenAI, Anthropic, pgvector, Qdrant, Cohere/BGE rerankers, RAGAS, Promptfoo, LangSmith